Re: [Summary-Talk] Summary Speed

["postmaster" <postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Just curious: what types of speeds are people getting? On my machine g3 
400
running oS X 10.2.4, unfiltered I get around 30,000 records a second: sub
reports (3) and filtering local ip's out: 13-15,000 per sec.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John May" <jmaymailing@pointinspace.com>
To: <summary-talk@lists.summary.net>
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Summary-Talk] Summary Speed


> Jason -
>
> I'm not running into any RAM limitations.  No more sub-reports or
> filtering exist in the new setup vs. the old one.
>
> What do you mean by "filtering things out" to speed things up?  I've
> minimized as much as possible on the Memory config page.
>
> - John
>
> >The most important thing to check is to see if you are running out of
> >physical memory and starting to swap to virtual memory. Take a look at
> >the General:Program Status report and look at the Memory used number. You
> >want to make sure that you have more physical RAM than Summary is using.
> >Otherwise it will start to slow down dramatically.
> >
> >If you have more sub-reports, or much more filtering, than you used to
> >that could also make a significant difference.
> >
> >Otherwise Summary should be within 10% of the speed it used to be.
> >
> >Disabling reports, on the Disable Reports configuration page, has no
> >effect on speed. Filtering things out will usually speed things up, as
> >will most of the memory saving settings on the Memory configuration page.
> >
> >Good Luck
> >Jason
> >
> >
> >On 3/23/03 2:46 PM John May (jmaymailing@pointinspace.com) wrote:
> >
> >>I'm not doing DNS lookups at all.  It may be that more reports are
> >>generated with the newer version of Summary - we were running a
> >>considerably older version on OS 9.
> >>
> >>What are the best things to turn off to speed up processing?  Does
> >>each report that is enabled in Summary require more processing time?
> >>Eg: should I start disabling reports to speed things up back to
> >>normal?
> >
> >-----------------
> >Jason@Summary.Net
> >-----------------
> >Dr. Seuss books . . . can be read and enjoyed on several levels. For
> >example, 'One Fish Two Fish, Red Fish Blue Fish' can be deconstructed
> >as a searing indictment of the narrow-minded binary counting system.
> >   -- Peter van der Linden, Expert C Programming, Deep C Secrets
>
> --
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> John May : President                  <http://www.pointinspace.com>
> Point In Space Internet Solutions             jmay@pointinspace.com
> LPA Corporate Partner / FSA Associate                 ICQ: 35902494
>
>    Lasso 5 + 6 / PHP / MySQL / FileMaker Pro Hosting Now Available!
-------------
Go to <http://summary.net/list.html> to update subscription info.