Re: [Summary-Talk] Why is summary so unreliable?

To: summary-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Summary-Talk] Why is summary so unreliable?
From: Bret Baptist <bbaptist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:10:21 -0500
In-reply-to: <p06100558bd820539feb6@[192.168.0.5]>
Organization: Internet Exposure
References: <200409301201.45319.bbaptist@iexposure.com> <p06100558bd820539feb6@[192.168.0.5]>
Reply-to: summary-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-summary-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.7

On Thursday 30 September 2004 1:47 pm, John May wrote:
> I don't have any solutions for you, but Summary has run rock-solid
> for us for years.  I think your experience is more the exception to
> the rule.

How many domains and how many GB of logs?


Bret.


>
>  - John
>

< rant snip>
-- 
Bret Baptist
Systems and Technical Support Specialist
bbaptist@iexposure.com
Internet Exposure, Inc.
http://www.iexposure.com
 
(612)676-1946 x17
Web Development-Web Marketing-ISP Services
------------------------------------------


Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
-------------
Go to <http://summary.net/list.html> to update subscription info.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Summary-Talk] Why is summary so unreliable?
  - From: John May

References:
- [Summary-Talk] Why is summary so unreliable?
  - From: Bret Baptist
- Re: [Summary-Talk] Why is summary so unreliable?
  - From: John May

Prev by Date: [Summary-Talk] More crashes
Next by Date: RE: [Summary-Talk] Why is summary so unreliable?
Previous by thread: Re: [Summary-Talk] Why is summary so unreliable?
Next by thread: Re: [Summary-Talk] Why is summary so unreliable?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread