Re: [Summary-Talk] Why is summary so unreliable?

[Bret Baptist <bbaptist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Friday 01 October 2004 11:35 am, Jason Linhart wrote:
> On 10/1/04 12:13 PM Bret Baptist (bbaptist@iexposure.com) wrote:
> >No, the first is running debian 3.0 with a kernel 2.6.7 on a P3 866 with
> >2GB registered ECC RAM and 1 40GB IDE drive, the other is Mandrakelinux
> >10.0 with a 2.6.3 kernel on a dual P3 866 with 2GB registered ECC RAM
> >and mirrored 74GB Ultra 160 SCSI drives.
>
> I did my testing on RedHat 9 with kernel 2.4.20 on an AMD processor. The
> second machine was OS X 10.3 on a dual G5 tower.

OK?

Do you have a 2.6 kernel to test on?

>
> Jason
>
> -----------------
> Jason@Summary.Net
> -----------------
> Dr. Seuss books . . . can be read and enjoyed on several levels. For
> example, 'One Fish Two Fish, Red Fish Blue Fish' can be deconstructed
> as a searing indictment of the narrow-minded binary counting system.
>   -- Peter van der Linden, Expert C Programming, Deep C Secrets
> -------------
> Go to <http://summary.net/list.html> to update subscription info.

-- 
Bret Baptist
Systems and Technical Support Specialist
bbaptist@iexposure.com
Internet Exposure, Inc.
http://www.iexposure.com
 
(612)676-1946 x17
Web Development-Web Marketing-ISP Services
------------------------------------------


Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
-------------
Go to <http://summary.net/list.html> to update subscription info.